[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101118090828.GA28467@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:08:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9 UPDATED-1] x86: Initialize 32bit logical apicid
mapping early during boot
* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 11/18/2010 09:42 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > This is a very sensitive area of code that tends to blow up in nasty
> > ways. So when we do changes here we want them super-finegrained. If
> > you split it up into 30 reasonable patches - no problem at
> > all. (here up to 5 would suffice i think)
>
> I'll probably split it to three or four. That said, I don't really
> think it would help bisection. But, anyways, no problem.
The most critical patch will of course be the most likely one to regress so a
split-up does not help bisection per se.
The help this does for us is _fixing_ stuff: we will be looking at a 20 lines patch,
not a 200 lines one ...
> [...] For now, I would suggest leaving them ugly. At least
> they're now properly localized after the patchset.
ok. Please add a comment declaring the ugliness and explaining why they are ugly -
so that future hackers see it as an exception to the rule, not as an example to
follow ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists