linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1290080774.2109.1378.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:46:14 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event
 registers v3

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:16 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > > + * Runs later because per cpu allocations don't work early on.
> > > + */
> > > +__initcall(init_intel_percore);
> > 
> > I've got a patch moving the whole pmu init to early_initcall(), which is
> > after mm_init() so it would actually work.
> 
> So do you want to make  this patchkit depend on that patch?
> Or just integrate it and then change later? 

Doesn't really matter, I can fix it up afterwards, just wanted to let
you know.. I can also flip that enable thing.

I'll take these 4 patches and fixup these things and then see what falls
out ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/