linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05 of 66] compound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101118114902.GJ8135@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:49:03 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, bpicco@...hat.com,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05 of 66] compound_lock

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 04:27:40PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> 
> Add a new compound_lock() needed to serialize put_page against
> __split_huge_page_refcount().
> 

Does it only apply to a compound page? If I pass in a PageTail, what
happens? Could do with a beefier description on why it's needed but
maybe it's obvious later.

> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>  #include <linux/range.h>
>  #include <linux/pfn.h>
> +#include <linux/bit_spinlock.h>
>  
>  struct mempolicy;
>  struct anon_vma;
> @@ -302,6 +303,40 @@ static inline int is_vmalloc_or_module_a
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static inline void compound_lock(struct page *page)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +	bit_spin_lock(PG_compound_lock, &page->flags);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline void compound_unlock(struct page *page)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +	bit_spin_unlock(PG_compound_lock, &page->flags);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static inline void compound_lock_irqsave(struct page *page,
> +					 unsigned long *flagsp)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	compound_lock(page);
> +	*flagsp = flags;
> +#endif
> +}
> +

The pattern for spinlock irqsave passes in unsigned long, not unsigned
long *. It'd be nice if they matched.

> +static inline void compound_unlock_irqrestore(struct page *page,
> +					      unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +	compound_unlock(page);
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>  static inline struct page *compound_head(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	if (unlikely(PageTail(page)))
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ enum pageflags {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
>  	PG_hwpoison,		/* hardware poisoned page. Don't touch */
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +	PG_compound_lock,
> +#endif
>  	__NR_PAGEFLAGS,
>  
>  	/* Filesystems */
> @@ -397,6 +400,12 @@ static inline void __ClearPageTail(struc
>  #define __PG_MLOCKED		0
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +#define __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK		(1 << PG_compound_lock)
> +#else
> +#define __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK		0
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * Flags checked when a page is freed.  Pages being freed should not have
>   * these flags set.  It they are, there is a problem.
> @@ -406,7 +415,8 @@ static inline void __ClearPageTail(struc
>  	 1 << PG_private | 1 << PG_private_2 | \
>  	 1 << PG_buddy	 | 1 << PG_writeback | 1 << PG_reserved | \
>  	 1 << PG_slab	 | 1 << PG_swapcache | 1 << PG_active | \
> -	 1 << PG_unevictable | __PG_MLOCKED | __PG_HWPOISON)
> +	 1 << PG_unevictable | __PG_MLOCKED | __PG_HWPOISON | \
> +	 __PG_COMPOUND_LOCK)
>  
>  /*
>   * Flags checked when a page is prepped for return by the page allocator.
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/