[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101118210642.GA24236@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:06:42 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Youngdale <eric@...ante.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend][SCSI] Reduce number of sequential pointer
derefs in scsi_error.c and reduce size as well
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:49:29PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> @@ -617,10 +623,10 @@ static int scsi_try_bus_device_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>
> static int __scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> {
> - if (!scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> - return FAILED;
> -
> - return scmd->device->host->hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
> + struct scsi_host_template *hostt = scmd->device->host->hostt;
> + if (!hostt->eh_abort_handler)
> + return FAILED;
> + return hostt->eh_abort_handler(scmd);
Not that I have much to do with SCSI anymore... I spotted the above.
Is there any particular reason for using spaces to indent here rather
than our usual tabs?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists