[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101118210900.GB3874@vigoh>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:09:00 -0200
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
(wireless tree related)
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> [2010-11-18 13:27:24 +1100]:
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:03:01 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/16/10 18:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945.o: In function `iwl_legacy_mac_reset_tsf':
> > > (.opd+0xf00): multiple definition of `iwl_legacy_mac_reset_tsf'
> > > drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwlagn.o:(.opd+0x90): first defined here
> .
> .
> > > I should have known when I reported the warning ...
> > >
> > > Caused by commit dd0dd411f7178a20ea93a3cfa39123f078a07e25 ("iwlwifi: fix
> > > modular legacy build errors").
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> >
> > Ack. John, please drop/revert that patch.
> >
> > Sorry about the problem.
>
> Looks like John removed it but the bluetooth tree (which is based on top
> of the wireless tree) brought it back in by rebasing on top of yesterday's
> wireless tree. :-(
>
> I have reverted it again today.
Sorry about that, I wasn't aware of this problem. I'm going to redo my
tree today to fix this issue.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists