linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] msm: gpio: Add irq support to v2 gpiolib.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTiknSudbo_j+nqBqmds49CWyqXf0jpvz+DTYH-zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:49:47 -0800
From:	Janakiram Sistla <janakiram.sistla@...il.com>
To:	Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	dwalker@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] msm: gpio: Add irq support to v2 gpiolib.

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Gregory Bean <gbean@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Janakiram Sistla wrote:
>
>>> Targets with the v2 block define CONFIG_MSM_V2_TLMM.
>>
>> So in that case we can name  it as gpio-tlmm.c ??
>
> No, not and have things be any clearer.
>
> All MSM chips have a TLMM block.  The older chips have
> version 1 (v1) of the TLMM block.  The newer chips have v2.
I think that we should differentiate the new gpio infrastructure with
appropriate naming that makes the diff between v1 and v2
> --
> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/