linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [PATCH] backlight: grab ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101122175332.GC18808@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:53:32 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] backlight: grab ops_lock before testing
 bd->ops

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:59:07AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:43 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > According to the comment describing ops_lock in the definition of
> > > struct backlight_device and when comparing with other functions in
> > > backlight.c the mutex must be hold when checking ops to be non-NULL.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
> The problem was introduced by c835ee7f4154992e6cf0674d7ee136f5d36247a4
> (that is in 2.6.29-rc1).  Is this relevant for stable?

Yes.

What is the git commit id of the fix in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/