[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101123085635.GH4693@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:56:35 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] backlight: grab ops_lock before testing
bd->ops
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:53:32AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:05:32AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:59:07AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:43 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > According to the comment describing ops_lock in the definition of
> > > > struct backlight_device and when comparing with other functions in
> > > > backlight.c the mutex must be hold when checking ops to be non-NULL.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
> > The problem was introduced by c835ee7f4154992e6cf0674d7ee136f5d36247a4
> > (that is in 2.6.29-rc1). Is this relevant for stable?
>
> Yes.
>
> What is the git commit id of the fix in Linus's tree?
I'll let you know when it hits his tree.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists