[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290585935.2438.14.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:05:35 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] timerfd: add TFD_NOTIFY_CLOCK_SET to watch for
clock changes
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 23:43 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 23.11.10 19:22, Alexander Shishkin (virtuoso@...nd.org) wrote:
>
> > Certain userspace applications (like "clock" desktop applets or cron or
> > systemd) might want to be notified when some other application changes
> > the system time. There are several known to me reasons for this:
> > - avoiding periodic wakeups to poll time changes;
> > - rearming CLOCK_REALTIME timers when said changes happen;
> > - changing system timekeeping policy for system-wide time management
> > programs;
> > - keeping guest applications/operating systems running in emulators
> > up to date.
> >
> > This is another attempt to approach notifying userspace about system
> > clock changes. The other one is using an eventfd and a syscall [1]. In
> > the course of discussing the necessity of a syscall for this kind of
> > notifications, it was suggested that this functionality can be achieved
> > via timers [2] (and timerfd in particular [3]). This idea got quite
> > some support [4], [5], [6] and some vague criticism [7], so I decided
> > to try and go a bit further with it.
>
> I agree with Kay, this is pretty much exactly what we want for
> systemd. (Assuming that the time jump due to system suspend is
> propagated to userspace like any other time jump with this path).
A "Tested-by: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>" would be
helpful, I think.
> So yeah, I'd be very happy if this could be merged.
Hmm, and question about why exactly the timerfd interface is a bad way
to go was ignored.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists