linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [BUG] memcg: fix false positive VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20101124092337.b9fe888f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:23:37 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutsemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] memcg: fix false positive VM_BUG on non-SMP

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:52:44 +0100
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:22:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:02:55 +0100
> > Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:16:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:48:50 +0200
> > > > "Kirill A. Shutsemov" <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > kernel BUG at mm/memcontrol.c:2155!
> > > > 
> > > > This bug has been there for a year, from which I conclude people don't
> > > > run memcg on uniprocessor machines a lot.
> > > > 
> > > > Which is a bit sad, really.  Small machines need resource control too,
> > > > perhaps more than large ones..
> > > 
> > > Admittedly, this patch is compile-tested on UP only, but it should be
> > > obvious enough.
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> > > Subject: [patch] memcg: fix page cgroup lock assert on UP
> > > 
> > > Page cgroup locking primitives use the bit spinlock API functions,
> > > which do nothing on UP.
> > > 
> > > Thus, checking the lock state can not be done by looking at the bit
> > > directly, but one has to go through the bit spinlock API as well.
> > > 
> > > This fixes a guaranteed UP bug, where asserting the page cgroup lock
> > > bit as a sanity check crashes the kernel.
> > > 
> > 
> > hm, your patch is the same as Kirill's, except you named it
> > page_is_cgroup_locked() rather than is_page_cgroup_locked().  I guess
> > page_is_cgroup_locked() is a bit better.
> 
> I had not sorted by threads and somehow assumed this was another
> forward from you of a bugzilla report or something.  I didn't see
> Kirill's patch until now.  Sorry!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujtisu.com>

Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/