[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:31:11 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] rcu: Fix series of spurious RCU softirqs
Hi,
I've observed some not so unfrequent series of spurious rcu
softirqs, sometimes happening at each ticks for a random
while.
These patches aims at fixing them.
Thanks.
Frederic Weisbecker (2):
rcu: Don't chase unnecessary quiescent states after extended grace periods
rcu: Stop checking quiescent states after grace period completion from remote
kernel/rcutree.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists