[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CED55A6.5090608@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:12:54 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>
CC: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix find_next_zero_bit and related assembly
On 11/23/2010 03:28 PM, James Jones wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 13:26:47 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, James Jones wrote:
>>> The find_next_bit, find_first_bit, find_next_zero_bit
>>> and find_first_zero_bit functions were not properly
>>> clamping to the maxbit argument at the bit level. They
>>> were instead only checking maxbit at the byte level.
>>> To fix this, add a compare and a conditional move
>>> instruction to the end of the common bit-within-the-
>>> byte code used by all the functions and be sure not to
>>> clobber the maxbit argument before it is used.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>
>>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
>>
>> Please send to RMK's patch system.
> Thanks for the review. It's already in the patch system, but I updated the
> entry to include your reviewed-by line.
Should this be sent to the stable tree too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists