linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix find_next_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1011241357520.9313@xanadu.home>
Date:	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:00:12 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix find_next_zero_bit and related assembly

On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 11/23/2010 03:28 PM, James Jones wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 13:26:47 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, James Jones wrote:
> >>> The find_next_bit, find_first_bit, find_next_zero_bit
> >>> and find_first_zero_bit functions were not properly
> >>> clamping to the maxbit argument at the bit level. They
> >>> were instead only checking maxbit at the byte level.
> >>> To fix this, add a compare and a conditional move
> >>> instruction to the end of the common bit-within-the-
> >>> byte code used by all the functions and be sure not to
> >>> clobber the maxbit argument before it is used.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> Please send to RMK's patch system.
> > Thanks for the review.  It's already in the patch system, but I updated the 
> > entry to include your reviewed-by line.
> 
> Should this be sent to the stable tree too?

It could, yes.  This is hardly an urgent fix though, as the bug has been 
there virtually forever.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/