lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31169.1290641617@death>
Date:	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:33:37 -0800
From:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
To:	David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: check for assigned mac before adopting the slaves mac address

David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com> wrote:

>Restore the check for a missing mac address before adopting the first
>slaves as it's own. This regression was introduced in:
>http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.36.y.git;a=commit;h=c20811a79e671a6a1fe86a8c1afe04aca8a7f085

	How exactly is this a regression?  The above referenced patch
changes the method used to decide if the bonding master needs to have
it's MAC address set.  The original way was "bonding master's MAC is
zero," after the above, it's "adding first slave."

	Do you have some use case that manually sets the master's MAC
address prior to adding any slaves?

	-J

>Signed-off-by: David Strand dpstrand@...il.com
>---
>diff -uprN a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c	2010-11-24 11:36:58.125640000 -0800
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c	2010-11-24 11:40:58.175640000 -0800
>@@ -1577,8 +1577,9 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond
> 	/* If this is the first slave, then we need to set the master's hardware
> 	 * address to be the same as the slave's. */
> 	if (bond->slave_cnt == 0)
>-		memcpy(bond->dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr,
>-		       slave_dev->addr_len);
>+		if (is_zero_ether_addr(bond->dev->dev_addr))
>+			memcpy(bond->dev->dev_addr, slave_dev->dev_addr,
>+			       slave_dev->addr_len);
>
>
> 	new_slave = kzalloc(sizeof(struct slave), GFP_KERNEL);

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ