[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1290674541.2072.564.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:42:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call in
migrate_pages
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:50 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index 4a57f13..2f0f55b 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -1308,6 +1308,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(migrate_pages, pid_t, pid, unsigned long, maxnode,
> >
> > /* Find the mm_struct */
> > read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > task = pid ? find_task_by_vpid(pid) : current;
> > if (!task) {
> > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > @@ -1315,6 +1316,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(migrate_pages, pid_t, pid, unsigned long, maxnode,
> > goto out;
> > }
> > mm = get_task_mm(task);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> >
> > err = -EINVAL;
>
> Thanks reporting. but mmotm seems already has the same patch.
Another one,... again:
Do we still need the tasklist_lock in this case?
Also, why is that think complaining, surely the tasklist_lock pins any
and all PID objects?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists