[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CEFB731.4050307@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:33:37 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "kconfig: Temporarily disable dependency warnings"
On 26.11.2010 13:33, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 25 November 2010 18:09, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Catalin Marinas
>> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>>> Now, commenting on your patches, you added a new statement, 'visible
>>> if...' for menus. Can we not change it to something like:
>>>
>>> -menu "I2C Algorithms"
>>> - depends on !I2C_HELPER_AUTO
>>> +menu "I2C Algorithms" if !I2C_HELPER_AUTO
>>>
>> no because if_expr are translated internally in term of dependency,
>> which we don't want.
>
> That's correct but I was wondering whether we could change this kind
> of 'if' to a visibility attribute or a weaker dependency and avoid
> 'select' warnings. This way we wouldn't introduce new keywords to the
> kconfig language.
I quite like the "visible if" notation because it makes it explicit that
it only affects the display of the menu and does not add any dependency
to the data.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists