[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101129081639.GA5142@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:16:39 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: Microcai <microcai@...oraproject.org>
Cc: "jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-console@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VT console need rewrite
Microcai, le Mon 29 Nov 2010 09:10:06 +0800, a écrit :
> 在 2010-11-28日的 20:11 +0100,Samuel Thibault写道:
> > Microcai, le Sun 28 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0800, a écrit :
> > > So, here is the design according to your description ..
> > >
> > > JUST export /dev/fb and /dev/pts and /dev/console
> > > The kernel use /dev/console, but invisible.
> > > The rest of the world uses /dev/pts
> > >
> > > Make init using /dev/fb to display boot message, and agetty runs
> > > on /dev/pts
> >
> > Errr, but that already exists, that's fbterm...
>
> Every time someone try to implement something , some other guy will jump
> out and say, that already exist, in user-space ..... blablablabla
But isn't that basically what you are describing?
(i.e. what's the use of using a pts and /dev/fb, if not for a userlevel
terminal to actually do the work?)
Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists