[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=c4THHSaBCmuxfTZ4k1WUGVkzJzCJXMgX82fzX@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:18:09 +0800
From: microcai <microcai@...oraproject.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gdb@...rceware.org, hellogcc@...elists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option
2010/11/29 Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:56:15AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
>>qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
>>But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
>>(gdb) p ret
>>$3 = <value optimized out>
>>And the code execution order is not right.
>>
>>This is becuase the Kernel is bult with gcc -O2. Gcc will not
>>generate enough debug message with file with -O2.
>>So GDB cannot work very well with Linux kernel.
>>
>>So I make a patch that add a option in "Kernel hacking" called "Close
>>GCC optimization". It will make kernel be built without -O2.
>>
>>I built and use it in i386 and x86_64. I will try to make it OK in other arch.
>>
>
> The problem is that some functions _have to_ be inlined and gcc without -O2
> doesn't inline them. Have check all the cases? I doubt.
>
> Also, what is size of vmlinux before applying your patch and after that?
> Does it increase too much?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists