[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r5e4lab7.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:59:40 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gdb@...rceware.org,
hellogcc@...elists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option
Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com> writes:
> Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
> qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
> But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
> (gdb) p ret
> $3 = <value optimized out>
> And the code execution order is not right.
Really the right place to fix a lot of this would be gcc (and perhaps
gdb). I suspect with some careful work the debugging experience
for -O2 could be improved a lot.
I also believe the latest gccs already have improvements in this area.
>
> This is becuase the Kernel is bult with gcc -O2. Gcc will not
> generate enough debug message with file with -O2.
> So GDB cannot work very well with Linux kernel.
>
> So I make a patch that add a option in "Kernel hacking" called "Close
> GCC optimization". It will make kernel be built without -O2.
You need to at least keep aggressive inlining for header files,
otherwise there will be too much code bloat and bad code.
Like -O1 -finline-functions ?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists