[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291025536.2904.6.camel@springer.wildebeest.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:12:16 +0100
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gdb@...rceware.org, hellogcc@...elists.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:59 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
> > qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
> > But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
> > (gdb) p ret
> > $3 = <value optimized out>
> > And the code execution order is not right.
>
> Really the right place to fix a lot of this would be gcc (and perhaps
> gdb). I suspect with some careful work the debugging experience
> for -O2 could be improved a lot.
> I also believe the latest gccs already have improvements in this area.
The VTA branch was merged for GCC 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Var_Tracking_Assignments
Which helps a lot with generating dwarf for previously "optimized out"
values. There were also a couple of papers on generating even better
debuginfo at the recent GCC Summit: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010
Jakub JelĂnek, Improving debug info for optimized away parameters
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=jelinek.pdf
Alexandre Oliva, Consistent Views at Recommended Breakpoints
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=oliva.pdf
Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists