[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101130142347.GH7403@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:23:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Add and use rdev_<level> macros
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 05:53:48AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Here's an earlier comment:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:30 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This looks reasonable, please rebase on top of Daniel's patches and
> > submit it properly (with changelog and so on).
> Sometimes it's simpler for an upstream maintainer to do
> something like:
Bearing in mind the above please note that discursive stuff like this
should come after the --- or in a separate mail so that it's separated
from the commit log for tools like git am. You submit a large number of
patches, you should be aware of things like this.
> git am -s <patch1.mbox>
> patch -p1 < patch2.mbox
> git commit --amend file
> instead of back and forthing.
The other standard approach is to delete patches after review which does
make that rather difficult; resubmission is much more standard than
incremental revisions of unapplied patches and is going to work even if
people are OK with the incremental patches.
> Use rdev_<level> convenience macros to emit rdev_get_name(rdev)
> along with whatever format/arg... is supplied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists