[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101206205217.GJ31777@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 20:52:17 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] msm: Secure Channel Manager (SCM) support
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:00:48PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:16:14 PST, Jeff Ohlstein said:
>
> > SCM is the protocol used to communicate between the secure and
> > non-secure code executing on the applications processor.
>
> Does the presence of SCM hardware imply SMP? From reading this, it's unclear
> why the dependence on SMP - it looks like scm.c is something that hardware that
> has one ARM processor and a 'secure processor' would still want. Or is the
> 'secure processor' just another (arbitrarily labeled) ARM CPU participating
> as a full SMP processor?
It's referring to the secure mode, which is a separate address space and
system running on the same CPU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists