[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101206.130015.246519364.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:00:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: amwang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] : __in_dev_get_rtnl() can use
rtnl_dereference()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:37:42 +0100
> Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 12:21 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>
>> Same here. RTNL is held. Please use __in_dev_get_rtnl()
>
> By the way we can use rtnl_dereference() in __in_dev_get_rtnl()
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] : __in_dev_get_rtnl() can use rtnl_dereference()
>
> If caller holds RTNL, we dont need a memory barrier
> (smp_read_barrier_depends) included in rcu_dereference().
>
> Just use rtnl_dereference() to properly document the assertions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists