linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] input: Introduce device information ioctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201012071340.26244.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:40:26 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ping Cheng <pingc@...om.com>,
	Chris Bagwell <chris@...bagwell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] input: Introduce device information ioctl

On Tuesday 07 December 2010, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:16, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi Henrik,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >> Today, userspace sets up an input device based on the data it emits.
> >> This is not always enough; a tablet and a touchscreen may emit exactly
> >> the same data, for instance, but the former should be set up with a
> >> pointer whereas the latter does not need to. Recently, a new type of
> >> touchpad has emerged where the buttons are under the pad, which changes
> >> handling logic without changing the emitted data. This patch introduces
> >> a new ioctl, EVIOCGDEVINFO, which allows userspace to extract information
> >> about the device resulting in proper setup.
> >
> > If we agree that the new ioctl is suitable we'llalso need to wireit up
> > through sysfs. Also, can we keep all definitions to INPUT_ namespace?
> 
> Please don't add new ioctls which are not extensible. The ioctl should
> carry the length or the version of the structure it asks for, so it
> can be extended in the future. Sysfs should be good enough for such
> interface though.

Please never add any ioctls that have a version or length field!

Ideally ioctls should have only scalar arguments, not structures,
so I'd recommend splitting it into two, so you can read type and
capability parameters separately.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/