[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFF4D4C.2070002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:18:04 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>
CC: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mrubin@...gle.com, kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] ftrace: fix event alignment: kvm:kvm_hv_hypercall
On 12/07/2010 11:16 PM, David Sharp wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand this. Can you elaborate? What does "32-bit addressable"
> > mean?
>
> The ring buffer gives you space that is a multiple of 4 bytes in
> length, and 32-bit aligned. Therefore it is useless to attempt to
> align the structure beyond 32-bit boundaries, eg, a 64-bit boundary,
> because it is unpredictable if the memory the structure will be
> written to is at a 64-bit boundary (addr % 8 could be 0 or 4).
>
> > And "predicated on packing the event structures"? Is the structure
> > __attribute__((packed)), or is it not?
>
> It is not packed in Linus' tree, but one of the patches before this
> patch in this patch series adds __attribute__((packed)). This patch
> assumes that the event packing patch has been applied. This patch
> should not be applied if the packing patch is not (hence,
> "predicated").
Thanks for the explanations, it makes sense now.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists