[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291835855.28378.149.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:17:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:05 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 11:01 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:43:14AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> can you add sth force_... in command line to take over ownership of perf from BIOS or previous kernel ?
> >>
> >> then still can use perf etc after we kexec from RHEL or SLES kernel to later kernel ( from 2.6.37)
> >
> > My understand is that you can't because the BIOS is actively using it
> > behind the scenes of the kernel (well during an SMI). I have a machine
> > where I tried to force take it but it still stopped triggering interrupts.
>
> how about second case: kexec from RHEL 6 stock kernel to upstream kernel ?
Its impossible to distinguish between a BIOS having claimed a counter
and a previous kernel not having shut things down properly.
The best we can do is allow a force parameter and let the user keep all
pieces when he uses it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists