[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFFDA9B.1030001@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:20:59 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip
On 12/08/2010 11:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:05 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 12/08/2010 11:01 AM, Don Zickus wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:43:14AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> can you add sth force_... in command line to take over ownership of perf from BIOS or previous kernel ?
>>>>
>>>> then still can use perf etc after we kexec from RHEL or SLES kernel to later kernel ( from 2.6.37)
>>>
>>> My understand is that you can't because the BIOS is actively using it
>>> behind the scenes of the kernel (well during an SMI). I have a machine
>>> where I tried to force take it but it still stopped triggering interrupts.
>>
>> how about second case: kexec from RHEL 6 stock kernel to upstream kernel ?
>
> Its impossible to distinguish between a BIOS having claimed a counter
> and a previous kernel not having shut things down properly.
>
> The best we can do is allow a force parameter and let the user keep all
> pieces when he uses it.
ok, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists