[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CFFEB00.5090807@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:30:56 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests
> showed a decrease ..
Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the
header in addition to the others.
>
> What compiler optimizations are you talking about
See
Subject: Weirdo gcc 4.3.x behaviour
Message-ID: <20101121191148.GA12234@...00.arm.linux.org.uk>
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29950
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists