[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D00AF3C.40603@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:28:12 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin
On 12/09/2010 12:38 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
>>> - /* Sleep for 100 us, and hope lock-holder got scheduled */
>>> - expires = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), 100000UL);
>>> - schedule_hrtimeout(&expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
>>> + if (first_round&& last_boosted_vcpu == kvm->last_boosted_vcpu) {
>>> + /* We have not found anyone yet. */
>>> + first_round = 0;
>>> + goto again;
>>
>> Need to guarantee termination.
>
> We do that by setting first_round to 0 :)
>
> We at most walk N+1 VCPUs in a VM with N VCPUs, with
> this patch.
>
Right. May be clearer by using a for () loop instead of the goto.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists