linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:16:33 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:21 -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> This should mostly work. There would be a small window there on
> rq->clock=sched_clock_cpu() and system_vtime doing sched_clock_cpu()
> and also the overhead of doing this everytime when this going
> backwards may happen rarely. 

Right, so something like the below removes that tiny race by re-using
rq->clock as now. It also removes some overhead by removing the IRQ
fudging (we already know IRQs are disabled).

It does have a few extra branches (2 afaict) than your monotonicity path
had, but it seems to me this approach is slightly more accurate.

---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1813,19 +1813,10 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
 	sched_clock_irqtime = 0;
 }
 
-void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
+static void __account_system_vtime(int cpu, u64 now)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int cpu;
-	u64 now, delta;
+	s64 delta;
 
-	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
-		return;
-
-	local_irq_save(flags);
-
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
 	delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu);
 	per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now;
 	/*
@@ -1836,16 +1827,36 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
 	 */
 	if (hardirq_count())
 		per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta;
-	else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(curr->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
+	else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(current->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
 		per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+}
+
+void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u64 now;
+	int cpu;
+
+	if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
+		return;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
+	cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+	__account_system_vtime(cpu, now);
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
 
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static u64 irq_time_cpu(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	account_system_vtime(current);
+	int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+
+	if (sched_clock_irqtime)
+		__account_system_vtime(cpu, rq->clock);
+
 	return per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu);
 }
 
@@ -1853,7 +1864,7 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct
 {
 	s64 irq_delta;
 
-	irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+	irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(rq) - rq->prev_irq_time;
 	rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
 
 	delta -= irq_delta;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/