linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] e1000e: cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101208193720.5e137627@nehalam>
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:37:20 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen <asbjorn@...jorn.biz>
Cc:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] e1000e: cleanup

On Thu,  9 Dec 2010 02:40:50 +0000
Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen <asbjorn@...jorn.biz> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This patchset fixes most checkstyle problems in e1000e.
> 
> Checkpatch summary:
> pre:	total:	221 errors,	129 warnings,	24520 lines checked
> post:	total:	2 errors,	34 warnings,	24533 lines checked

IMHO these patches are in the why bother category, they deal only
with whitespace and things that checkpatch is too stupid to understand.

Checkpatch is a rough saw only appropriate to doing initial cutting
through crap drivers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/