[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A24AE1FFE7AEC5489F83450EE98351BF2A40FED661@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:35:08 +0800
From: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com" <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"lethal@...ux-sh.org" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....com>,
"Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in
x86_64
Both Tejun's and my patches are under review process, the hotplug emulator patchset is much earlier than Tejun's patch. Currently, I did not know how to handle this situation.
It seems that I have 3 options:
1) continue to send this patchset based on current upstream kernel
2) continue to send this patchset based on upstream kernel + Tejun's patch
3) Postpone the patchset until Tejun's patches are accepted.
Can someone provide some suggestions? Thanks so much.
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
-----Original Message-----
From: David Rientjes [mailto:rientjes@...gle.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 5:37 AM
To: Zheng, Shaohui; Tejun Heo
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com; lethal@...ux-sh.org; Andi Kleen; dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Ingo Molnar; Brown, Len; Yinghai Lu; Li, Haicheng
Subject: Re: [5/7,v8] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Support cpu probe/release in x86_64
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, shaohui.zheng@...el.com wrote:
> From: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
>
This patch is undoubtedly going to conflict with Tejun's unification of
the 32 and 64 bit NUMA boot paths, specifically the patch at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129087151912379.
Tejun, what's the status of that patchset posted on November 27? Any
comments about this change?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists