[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1291945065-sup-1838@think>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:38:36 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Jon Nelson <jnelson@...poni.net>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, htejun <htejun@...il.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? (was: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective)
Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2010-12-09 18:16:16 -0500:
> > 512MB.
> >
> > 'free' reports 75MB, 419MB free.
> >
> > I originally noticed the problem on really real hardware (thinkpad
> > T61p), however.
>
> If you can easily reproduce it could you try a git bisect?
Do we have a known good kernel? I looked back through the thread and
didn't see any reports where the postgres test on ext4 passed in this
config.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists