linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] at91: Refactor Stamp9G20 and PControl G20 board file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:19:58 +0300
From:	Igor Plyatov <plyatov@...il.com>
To:	Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	costa.antonior@...il.com, linux@...im.org.za,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com,
	pgsellmann@...tner-elektronik.at, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] at91: Refactor Stamp9G20 and PControl G20 board file

Dear Christian,

> As PControl G20 is a carrier board for the Stamp9G20 SoM, some code can
> be shared. Therefore board-stamp9g20.c is refactored to allow reusing the
> SoM initialization and board-pcontrol-g20.c is modified to use it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Glindkamp <christian.glindkamp@...kit.de>
> ---
> 
> How about this approach? Compile tested for PControl G20 and run time tested
> for Stamp9G20 EVB and PortuxG20.
> 
> Just a side note: PortuxG20 is not a carrier board for the Stamp9G20. It just
> shares so much with the evaluation board, that it makes sense to put them both
> into the same file. And there is no intention to put other boards into this
> file.

The idea from this patch is clean.
Yours patch does not apply to the kernel from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git,
but I apply its content by hands and kernels compiled successfully with
stamp9g20_defconfig and pcontrol_g20_defconfig.

Please run ./scripts/checkpatch.pl with you patch and correct all errors
and warnings reported. 

If you will correct this patch, to be applicable, then I will vote to
include it into mainline.

Which kernel repository and branch should I use for the AT91 ARM?
I just want to know - whereto send my next patch to support gms machine?

Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/