[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinY0pcTcd+OxPLyvsJgHgh=cTaB1-8VbEA2tstb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:11:30 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mlock: only hold mmap_sem in shared mode when
faulting in pages
On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, patch 1/6 changes the long hold time to be in read mode instead
> of write mode, which is only a band-aid. But, this prepares for patch
> 5/6, which releases mmap_sem whenever there is contention on it or
> when blocking on disk reads.
I have to say that I'm not a huge fan of that horribly kludgy
contention check case.
The "move page-in to read-locked sequence" and the changes to
get_user_pages look fine, but the contention thing is just disgusting.
I'd really like to see some other approach if at all possible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists