linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1291969683.10384.51.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:28:03 +0800
From:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu

On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 03:21 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > +       /* Check CPUID signatures: 06_1AH, 06_1EH, 06_1FH */
> > +       family = boot_cpu_data.x86;
> > +       model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model;
> > +       if (family != 6 || (model != 0x1A && model != 0x1E && model != 0x1F))
> > +               return; 
> 
> So that's 26, 30 and 31? Curiously
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c does have 31.
> 
> Also, could you match the style from perf_event_intel.c?

OK.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/