[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291969708.10384.52.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:28:28 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 03:24 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>
> > @@ -1362,6 +1357,7 @@ int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
> >
> > switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
> > case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
> > + init_uncore_pmu();
> > err = intel_pmu_init();
> > break;
> > case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
>
> Since you're otherwise fully separated from the regular cpu driver,
> could you also grow your own early_initcall() ?
OK, will use early_initcall().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists