linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1292026104.5015.1540.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:08:24 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that
 WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true

On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Yeah, I was lost thinking about the busiest case where workers are
> busy processing works consecutively.  Usually workers are of course
> switching in and out of idle state all the time.
> 
> How about just dropping likely/unlikely?

OK, if I just remove it, can I add your Acked-by?

Thanks,

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/