linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim9w7607d5sNbZ+U89QJhp4cxR7Lhy+4z90DPmB@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:32:31 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>
> NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if
> CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y.
>
I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from
hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?

thanks,
rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/