[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101213144434.GB18577@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:34 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27:02AM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20101209:
> >
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:28: error: redefinition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog'
> > include/linux/nmi.h:22: note: previous definition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog' was here
I'll have to checkout that branch to see what got merged. I thought I
fixed all these. Is there a config I can use to duplicate these?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index c558e11..2056569 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
> {
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
NAK. This isn't the right patch. This chunk is in here because of
changes to nmi.h. Something broke in that file.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists