[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292251270.3320.79.camel@odin>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:41:10 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Call into regulator driver only when
voltage min/max really changes.
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 02:55 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Even in cases where the consumer driver calls the regulator core with
> different voltage min/max values, the application of the various
> voltage constraints could result in the min/max voltage values passed
> to the regulator driver to be unchanged since the previous invocation.
>
> Optimize these cases by not calling into the regulator driver and not
> sending incorrect/unnecessary voltage change notifications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
This doesn't apply. Any chance you could regenerate against the
regulator for-next branch ?
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists