lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292251270.3320.79.camel@odin>
Date:	Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:41:10 +0000
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Call into regulator driver only when
 voltage min/max really changes.

On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 02:55 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Even in cases where the consumer driver calls the regulator core with
> different voltage min/max values, the application of the various
> voltage constraints could result in the min/max voltage values passed
> to the regulator driver to be unchanged since the previous invocation.
> 
> Optimize these cases by not calling into the regulator driver and not
> sending incorrect/unnecessary voltage change notifications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>

This doesn't apply. Any chance you could regenerate against the
regulator for-next branch ?

Thanks

Liam  
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ