[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7hfe5aw2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:34:37 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
At Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:40:41 +0000,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:38:36PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > Meanwhile, I wondered whether it's the really wanted behavior for
> > that particular code path, thus the previous question to Liam.
>
> Yes, it's desired behaviour. That's what the old code was trying to do.
OK, now I merged to sound git tree.
Also it's merged back to topic/asoc branch with a conflict fix.
Please pull appropriately.
(I still don't remember why it had to be flush_work_sync() instead
of cancel_work_sync() in the remove callback path for ASoC, though...
Both aren't so much different nowadays and should work fine in such a
case, though :)
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists