[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292246943.3320.59.camel@odin>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:29:03 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 09:34 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:40:41 +0000,
> Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 01:38:36PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > > Meanwhile, I wondered whether it's the really wanted behavior for
> > > that particular code path, thus the previous question to Liam.
> >
> > Yes, it's desired behaviour. That's what the old code was trying to do.
>
> OK, now I merged to sound git tree.
> Also it's merged back to topic/asoc branch with a conflict fix.
> Please pull appropriately.
>
> (I still don't remember why it had to be flush_work_sync() instead
> of cancel_work_sync() in the remove callback path for ASoC, though...
> Both aren't so much different nowadays and should work fine in such a
> case, though :)
Fwiw, I can't remember either why it had to be flush_work_sync() here.
The initial soc-core stuff was 5 years ago and the reason is well and
truly forgotten ;-)
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists