Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:04:37 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Daisuke HATAYAMA <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [Patch 0/21] Non disruptive application core dump
 infrastructure

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:22:59 +0530
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is series of patches implementing an infrastructure for capturing the core 
> of an application without disrupting its process semantics.
> 
> The infrastructure makes use of the freezer subsystem in kernel to freeze the 
> threads and then collect the information to generate  the core.
> 
> The interface is provided by a /proc/pid/core file, reading which can give the 
> ELF formatted core of the process with "pid". The interface supports "seek" 
> operation on the fd, allowing the dumper to have control on the data that is 
> being dumped. Also it allows the user to store the dump at any location.
> 
> The current implementation supports both native as well as the compat ELF 
> tasks.
> 
> An open() call to the /proc/pid/core will try to freeze the threads in the 
> process and the read() requests will dynamically generate the contents for the 
> core file. The ELF header & Program Headers are stored in a kernel buffer to 
> allow us to map the fpos to the required data section.
> 
> In case a thread is not frozen within a time interval, after issuing the freeze 
> request, we fill the register state information with 0's to indicate we could 
> not capture the data.
> 
> A close() would kick the threads out of the refrigerator().
> 
> 
> The implementation reuses some of the existing ELF core generation code by 
> exporting them. Some of the code common to both native and compat ELF class 
> support has been moved to a common place, elfcore-common.c. Also some of the 
> reusable functions, specific to the ELF class handling, has been made global, 
> after renaming the compat version of the same.
> 
> We also added a new API -elf_core_copy_extra_phdrs() -for "reading" the arch 
> specific program headers, versus the existing elf_core_write_extra_phdrs().
> 
> Patches 1 to 9 deals with re-arranging the ELF code to be reusable by the 
> infrastructure.
> 
> Patches 10 to 21 implements the infrastructure.
> 
> TODO: Add support for collecting the arch specific notes, currently used only 
> by Cell platform.
> 
> Please let me know your review comments / thoughts.
> 

Your purpose of this patch is to debug an application without attaching to gdb
or take coredump by gcore ? 

IIUC, "freeze" is a bit dangerous because no one can ends the application while
it's freezed and there is no information "it's frozen" via usaual user commands
as 'ps' or 'top'. 

Can you add a new freeze state where the application can get SIGKILL,
at least ? and show task's state as "frozen" in some way ? as
task_state_array[] shows it in /proc/<pid>/status

Thanks,
-Kame




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists