linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43532.6714.qm@web120701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:07:49 -0800 (PST)
From:	Daniel Kopko <dk_fedorabugs@...oo.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dk_fedorabugs@...oo.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the irqtime code to deal with u64 wraps

Sorry for the lack of quoted text and lack of In-Reply-To headers.  (I am 
replying from a webmail account in reference to the following message:  
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=129224292425624&w=2 ).  It seems that 
perhaps an unintentional omission of inline happened in this patch set, when 
converting update_rq_clock to static linkage.

-inline void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
+static void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)

The rest of the functions which had static linkage added retained
the inline modifier.

This is my first message to LKML.  Can anyone recommend a decent free
email provider that will work well here?  Also, please CC me directly if 
convenient
for any replies.

Thanks,

Daniel Kopko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/