[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101217161200.GA5548@peq>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:12:00 -0600
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] user namespaces: Add a user_namespace as
creator/owner of uts_namespace
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * userns count is 1 for root user, 1 for init_uts_ns,
> > + * and 1 for... ?
> > + */
> > struct user_namespace init_user_ns = {
> > .kref = {
> > - .refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
> > + .refcount = ATOMIC_INIT(3),
>
> +1 is for init_nsproxy ;-)
Hmm, actually user_namespace isn't in struct nsproxy any more,
since 18b6e0414e42d95183f07d8177e3ff0241abd825.
I think my original thought was that init_user_ns is pinned twice by
root_user - once as creator and once as the root user in it. In
which case it isn't right - the user_ns pins the task which created
it, the creator does not pin the user_ns it creates.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists