lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:13:44 +0100 From: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com> To: <hpa@...or.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...e.hu> CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <andreas.herrmann3@....com> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] x86, amd: Normalize compute unit IDs on multi-node processors From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> On multi-node CPUs we don't need the socket wide compute unit ID but the node-wide compute unit ID. Thus we need to normalize the value. This is similar to what we do with cpu_core_id. A compute unit is then identified by physical_package_id, node_id, and compute_unit_id. Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 8 ++++++-- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index 9e093f8..9645604 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int __cpuinit nearby_node(int apicid) #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT static void __cpuinit amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { - u32 nodes; + u32 nodes, cores_per_cu; u8 node_id; int cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* get compute unit information */ smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1; c->compute_unit_id = ebx & 0xff; + cores_per_cu = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1; } else if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) { u64 value; @@ -288,15 +289,18 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_get_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* fixup multi-node processor information */ if (nodes > 1) { u32 cores_per_node; + u32 cus_per_node; set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM); cores_per_node = c->x86_max_cores / nodes; + cus_per_node = cores_per_node / cores_per_cu; /* store NodeID, use llc_shared_map to store sibling info */ per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) = node_id; /* core id to be in range from 0 to (cores_per_node - 1) */ - c->cpu_core_id = c->cpu_core_id % cores_per_node; + c->cpu_core_id %= cores_per_node; + c->compute_unit_id %= cus_per_node; } } #endif diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c index 083e99d..3bc0435 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) { if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id && + per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu) == per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, i) && c->compute_unit_id == o->compute_unit_id) link_thread_siblings(cpu, i); } else if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id && -- 1.5.6.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists