linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf bts: Introduce new sub command 'perf bts trace'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101221190203.GQ1750@nowhere>
Date:	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:02:06 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@...achi.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf bts: Introduce new sub command 'perf
 bts trace'

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:52:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:45 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:40:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 19:31 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Actually the best would be to select PERF_SAMPLE_ID in the sample_type
> > > > on record and also PERF_FORMAT_ID in the read_format.
> > > 
> > > That would grow the data size for little gain, as long as you only
> > > record BTS data into the buffer the current bits should work fine.
> > 
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > In the longer term though, I think we need a specific branch set record.
> > 
> > Currently for every branch pair we create a new event with all the headers,
> > so the pid, time, etc... are all repeated for every entries.
> > 
> > We rather need a single record everytime we flush the bts buffer to the perf
> > buffer.
> 
> We also don't want arch specific data interfaces, so we need to iterate
> the bts buffer and copy the stuff anyway, and if you don't want the time
> and pid bits don't set those PERF_SAMPLE bits.


But we may actually want the time and pid bits.

This could be a PERF_SAMPLE_RAW may be?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/