[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1292961383.2170.31.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:56:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@...achi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf bts: Introduce new sub command 'perf
bts trace'
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 20:02 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> This could be a PERF_SAMPLE_RAW may be?
Well clearly not ;-)
But maybe we can do something like: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLES (note the
plural):
struct {
struct perf_event_header header;
u64 nr;
u32 common_type;
u32 data_type;
struct perf_sample common;
struct perf_sample data[nr];
}
Where struct perf_sample is PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE without the
perf_event_header bit.
Where we can split the many samples into a piece that is the same for
all perf_samples::common, where the content specified by the
PERF_SAMPLE_ bits from ::common_type, and the the rest lives in data[]
specified by the PERF_SAMPLE_ bits from ::data_type.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists