linux-kernel - Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101221235127.GC10081@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:51:27 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:13:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Well, the _solution_ is to get rid of the legacy stuff from those buses in the
> first place.  Then, they'll just need to use the generic ops without any
> trouble.

> What you're proposing is a workaround that people will use as an excuse for
> not doing the right thing forever.

I hadn't actually realised that there was any urgency about removing the
old APIs - I'd not really seen much work in that direction.  If the
intention is to actively push people over to dev_pm_ops that does make a
bit more sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/